Radiometric Thermal Analysis
Review temperature data in original files, regions of interest, and temperature differences using the measurement context available in the file.
Unified inspection platform
A clearer view of your electrical infrastructure
HealthyGrid connects field inspections, radiometric thermal image analysis, corona review, and findings tracking in one platform. Field evidence stays linked to equipment and inspection history, supporting expert review and maintenance decisions.
The platform provides suggested findings and measurement tools. Qualified professionals interpret the evidence and approve decisions.
Region of interestSource: file
The operational problem
Field evidence needs its context.
Images, measurements, and notes are most useful when they remain linked to the equipment that was inspected, comparable to earlier visits, and connected to documented follow-up. When those pieces are scattered across folders, spreadsheets, and separate reports, the context is lost exactly where a decision needs it.
HealthyGrid keeps the working sequence together: the original image, the measurement derived from it, the finding that was opened, the inspector’s decision, and the work that followed — all attached to the same asset over time.
- Field evidence stays with the equipment it belongs to, not as loose files.
- A repeat inspection starts from the previous visit’s record, not a blank page.
- The professional decision and its reasoning are documented next to the evidence behind it.
Core capabilities
What the platform does
Six capabilities that together form the working sequence, from field capture to closing a finding.
Corona Video Review
Review supported video, select evidence frames, and document findings in relation to the equipment inspected.
AI-Assisted Equipment Identification
Suggested equipment identification in the image, which a professional can review, correct, or reject.
Asset Inspection History
Link images and findings to assets and earlier inspections, so professional context carries forward over time.
Hebrew and English Reports
Present evidence, measurements, and findings in a structured document, ready for review and sharing inside the organization.
Maintenance Follow-Up
Track progress from an open finding, through planning and work, to a repeat inspection that verifies the repair.
The workflow
Five stages that stay connected
Each stage passes on the full context — the asset, the evidence, the measurement, and the decision.
Plan
Define the area, asset, and inspection order before going out.
Inspect
Capture media, measurements, and notes linked directly to the asset.
Analyze
Review the data and the platform’s suggestions inside the same case file.
Report
Produce documented output with evidence, measurements, and context.
Follow Up
Return to the finding, record the work done, and verify on a repeat visit.
Try it
Upload an original thermal file and explore its data
The trial works on original files only. A screenshot or a converted image contains no measurement data, and the platform says so explicitly rather than displaying values with no source.
Upload
Choose the original file from the camera.
File check
Validate the file contents and show the available context.
Results
Measurements, suggested findings, and the limits of the analysis.
Working with experts
AI suggests. The professional decides.
The platform suggests equipment identification and areas to review, and provides the measurement tools and context. The judgment about what a finding means, how severe it is, and what happens next stays with the professional — and is documented alongside the evidence it was based on.
What the platform provides
- Suggested equipment identification in thermal images and corona frames
- Measurement tools: spot, region of interest, and difference against a reference
- Display of analysis parameters and the source of every value
- Consistent documentation of evidence across visits
What stays with the professional
- Confirming, correcting, or rejecting a suggested identification
- Manually marking relevant regions
- Assessing severity and interpreting the finding
- Deciding how the work is handled and prioritized
The platform does not promise to detect every fault and does not automatically determine whether equipment is safe.
Pilot
A pilot built around your assets and inspection workflow
These are the measures we propose evaluating together during a pilot. They are stated here as questions to test — not as results already measured.
Time to produce a report
How long it takes from finishing the field inspection to a document ready for review.
Availability of prior evidence
How easily images and findings from earlier visits to the same asset can be retrieved.
Extent of expert correction
How often the platform’s suggested identifications are corrected or rejected on review.
Visibility of open findings
How clear it is, at any moment, which findings are open and what stage they are at.
No numeric targets are stated here. Targets are set against a baseline measured in your organization.
Not sure where this fits in your operation?
Tell us what equipment you inspect and what reporting looks like today, and we will come back with a concrete assessment.